Jennifer Hudson's $36 Album Cover Dress!

07/21/2008 at 01:00 PM ET

The Oscar winner has worn everything from Oscar de la Renta to Donna Karan, but for the cover of her new album, which hits stores in September, Jennifer Hudson proves that she’s no fashion snob, opting for a simple $36 glitter-striped American Apparel dress. Bargain hunting’s nothing new to the “Spotlight” singer, who readily admits to an obsession with affordable British chain Topshop. But while the cotton dress may have been a bargain, when it came to accessorizing the look she went decidedly high-end, glamming it up with a $475 LAI Vamp belt. We think Jennifer’s cover frock is even more flattering than some of her designer dresses (Oscars anyone?). And what we love most is that it’s a look we can get too! Click here to buy J. Hud’s dress at American Apparel. Interested in more affordable star fashion? Check out other star styles under $100 here including looks from Jennifer Lopez, Eva Longoria, Carrie Underwood and more.

Add A Comment

Got something to add to this post? Fill out the fields below to make a comment, ask a question or share a tip. We'd love to hear from you.

Note: If this is your first time commenting on Style News Now, your comment will need to be approved by our moderator before it will appear. Thanks for your patience, and check back again soon.

Showing 20 comments

Jessa on

Oh, I thought that was Rhianna. Jennifer Hudson is a beautiful young woman and has talent that can not be denied; it may not have been her decision to allow the extent of airbrushing that was done, but how ridiculous. Who’d she get, Mimi’s retoucher?

Lauren on

It beautiful and all but i agree with everyone else. You can tell the waist is smaller the top is way cute and affordable but come on! that much for a belt she could find at claire’s or the hair supple store! But i do like how it flows to look perfect but the semi messy hair make it look unperfect which puts it all together and gives it a edge!!!

Deborah on

Who’s body is this? It sure isn’t her’s. Too bad.. and I thought she loved her body the way it really is. Large beautiful women ROCK.

psupanda on

I read on either People’s website previously, that this image isn’t photoshopped. She lost a lot of weight.

alaina on

this photo is so obviously photoshopped like previously stated, it really is a disappointment. she looks so, so, SO MUCH BETTER at her real size. being a full-figured woman is a good thing, you dont HAVE to be skinny to look good! and although i am pregnant right now, my normal weight is 110-120, and a lot of the times i would rather be full-figured than be accused of having an eating disorder all the time!

susan on

God Bless her for wearing fashion the average girl can afford. that makes her a trendsetter for the people.

emo girl{tori again!} on


Joseph on

I agree, it is a bit too much photoshopped, but however she did lose a couple of pounds after the role she played in Dreamgirls. She had to gain weight to get the part, since she had the voice. I think she looks good; just too bad everyone knows her dress is super cheap. I’m sure that quick weave on her head cost more, it’s human hair lol.

roger on

This photo is NOT photoshopped. The smallest part of EVERYONES middle section is right under the breasts. She has lost a ton of weight and cinching a belt at the smallest part of her middle makes her look one more size smaller. Anyone at home can cinch a belt around the smallest part of their middle and make their waist look a size smaller instantly. Any moron knows that. You all are morons.

Next | 1 | 2 | Show All

From Our Partners


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,514 other followers

Sign up for our daily newsletter and other special offers.
    Choose your newsletters
Thank you for signing up! Your request may take up to one week to be processed.
    see all newsletters